Yes, and check this out:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/22/te...l?ref=business
I have been seeing things like this all over the web. Linux isn't even going to use GPL 3, they are sticking with 2. So this artical is way off on the FSF. I wish I knew why some people in the media have the idea the the FSF runs everything Linux. They don't even maintain the kernal. There is so much FUD out there right now. I've started looking for ways to let people know what is really going on by posting where I can, but where do these people get their info? That's why I want to look for the positive and start trying to clean up some of the miss information on both sides. I hate to say this, but part of me would love to see Microsoft try to sue every Linux user. If we are using their code, why don't they prove it? It's not like someone is hideing it from them!? It's OPEN CODE for crying out loud! The whole point of FOSS is that anyone can look at it at any time! (end rant)
On a postive not, Red Hat won't join MS and I doubt anyone else will. So the MS invation begins and ends with Novell.
Side note: I wonder if MS will ever make their own distro? lol
Bookmarks